Work and Pensions

Online Parliamentary Information Office and Yearbook: Are those Senior conservatives  & sources really so dim in just now waken up after 13 yrs of labours plunder ?
 Now realising the embezzling going on, and more to the point, the Tories are stuck...(serve'em right) they can't do anything now that would avoid them loosing votes. (They've lost it anyway) even before IDS  tries to rectify the busted welfare system without causing even more problems, and those effected by welfare curtailment are bound to walk directly into the labour party by default.
Just watch the socialist safety valve 'lift', in coming to the rescue.




Online Parliamentary Information Office and Yearbook: What about the disgusting treatment the unemployed are subjected to, by having their £71 per week benefits sanctioned for 13 weeks. Simply because they won't apply for a job that they cannot get to??

For an example.. A job advertised on Universal Jobmatch starts at 6am. Public transport doesn't start running until 6am, so the person simply can't get to the job.




Online Parliamentary Information Office Review

More on Honours

Online Parliamentary Information Office and Yearbook: The simple questions about the senior awards are:

Does the recipient of the title truly believe that they are better than anyone else because of it

Are they so deluded that they believe that their title makes up for poor work or underhand decisions throughout their lives

Do they not see that if a title is given to them for such bad performance, then the title itself is debased and deserves no special treatment

Do any of us treat such recipients any differently simply because of the title

And lastly, would we follow any of these "knights" or "lords" into battle because that was the criteria for such honours in the past.


Online Parliamentary Information Office and Yearbook: How many times must I read that politicians at all levels 'deserve' recognition through the honours system because 'they could earn more in the private sector'? Bunkum.  Let them attempt to do so; in the true private sector and not some sinecure provided by government and councils of all hues. Too many of our politicians have little or no experience of a real working life and wouldn't last a week in the private sector. There are thousands of real people who give their time and knowledge freely in the support of others.  It is they who deserve "honours"



read about parliamentary information office

About Wind Farms

Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: They are everywhere!  Scotland's landscape has been destroyed by these ugly monsters. On a recent trip to Montrose I counted no less than 38 separate wind farms - There is barely a spot on the M74 where you can't see one!


Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: The big question is how many more turbines will it take to produce 100 percent of Scotland's Electricty 100 percent of the time and at what cost Scotland is being festooned with turbines and power lines at the moment with less than 5 percent of electricty requirement s on average being produced .
Somebody in the UKs Energy departments need to get real and really work out what is required to meet power requirements of the future or is this too much to ask?


Online parliamentary information office reviews

Energy Ads

Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: In addition, the damned government is slapping taxes on energy, deliberately restricting supply and generally messing everything up under the lie of 'climate change' when really it is only a tax grabbing exercise.



Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: as keep telling me that I'd be better off switching to this or that deal. Somehow, I doubt they have my best interest at heart. The only way to 'save' money on my gas bill is to switch the central heating off.




Get the parliamentary information office and Parliamentary Diary Review

Economic Info

Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: It seems it was the pensioners who were prosteting last night.They have just lost their 'in-line with inflation'   increase.

I also think this is about the changes in unemployment benefits. The unemployed do not receive the emergency 400 Euros a month now, if they have parents working or grandparents on a pension. Yep, its the bank of mom and dad or Nan and granddad.
Spain has got to be out of the mess for next year, the cuts are horrendous.





Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: The illusion that you can switch hard times on and off at will as if politicians and bankers stand above the laws of economics will soon be debunked.

Money magic is a futile and dangerously childish belief that seems to have removed all will from politicians to deal with the real social and industrial causes of this appalling crisis.

Real productivity in the West has plummetted. Managers, in many cases, are lazy, incompetent, corrosively selfish and are doing catastrophic damage to real productivity.  There are too many of them and at the same time millions are being paid to do nothing.

This is the reality.  Rather than address reality, politicians still believe in the money magic fairy.  They are clueless, idealess and shadows of what heavyweight politicians once were and will soon need to be again.

It will be a great day when these people are hurled into political obscurity by the tidal wave of events coming our way.  It is going to happen, have no doubt about that.  Our ruling and middle classes have become complacent, lazy, selfish and decadent.



Other news related reviews and specification at parliamentary information office

Pension Reforms

Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: One further point the pensions industry was lambasted for telling people to opt out of SERPS and S2P and in many cases were told to pay compensation for misselling.  Will these companies now be able to claim the monies paid out from the Government.  I think not, or will I be able to claim money from the Government for running a Ponsi scheme under the name of National Insurance.  No I will just have to work until I drop


Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: It is all well and good running a campaign to say hands off our pensions when high earners will lose £1,000 per year. However, I heard no redress for people born between 1955 and 1960 who have seen their pensions disappear for between 2 and 7 years. My understanding that the delay in pension payment is not that there is not enough funds to pay pensions now but for the generation who are just starting work. Alot of people in that bracket will have paid into the system for over 50 years. Where was the justice for a large swathe of the population? Not a word. I suspect because the baby boomers have their pensions and the young generation have thrown in the towel and expect the state to provide



Other questions answers at parliamentary information office.

Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook

Online Parliamentary Information Yearbook: I have found the Parliamentary Yearbook invaluable. My editorial piece was published on line and in the 'hard copy' edition of The Yearbook. Apart from increasing the number of relationships my organisation has with certain central and local government organisations, it gave me the opportunity to establish relationships with other organisations such as charities, hospitals, healthcare organisations, community groups, schools, colleges, universities.

News and Information at Parliamentary Information Office.

Debt Crisis

Parliamentary Information Yearbook:

I wonder what surprises the EU have in store to ensure Berlusconi doesn't get back in? I'm betting its the same philosophy as that which drove him out. Let Italian bond yields rise in fear of his return to the point where GS/ECB again has to step in and install another technocrat.
I also have a sneaking suspicion that Monti tendered his exit to coincide with an appointment extremely high in the echelons of the Eurocracy. Wait for the announcement...

Parliamentary Information Yearbook:
announcement to run for the office for the fifth time'Maybe I have missed something here, but wasn't Berlusconi given a 4 year sentance for tax fraud. How can he run for office again? Can DT explain?Have I missed something here? Or are we ignoring that and going for a day of Italian bashing? I can live with that.

Parliamentary Information Office

  

Fight the ban: fight for choice campaign

Parliamentary Information Yearbook: Launched in May 2004, when the threat of a comprehensive public smoking ban in the UK became clear, our Fight the Ban: Fight for Choice campaign saw Forest engage is an unprecedented level of lobbying. For the first time, in addition to our regular media work, we placed a series of display advertisements in both the national and local press. Forest ads appeared in Blake's Parliamentary Yearbook and calls continued to flood in to the Forest office.


Parliamentary Information Office Resources and Parliamentary Yearbook

Comments on Go Green

Parliamentary Information Yearbook: Just when we thought that the politicians had plumbed the depths of stupidity they yet again find a way to alienate the people of this country from the political process and no doubt find a way to line their, or their chums, pockets in the process.

Attempting to tackle the, as yet unproven, problem of global warming by pandering to flatulent livestock in the third world, while ignoring the emissions of greenhouse gasses by India and China is pointless.

If we do have £2 billion to spare it would be better spent stimulating the economy of this country by moving people who live in areas liable to flood to higher ground. Because the major polluters are not going to change their ways. Welcome to Atlantis.


Parliamentary Information Yearbook: I see there is another climate change jamboree taking place. To limit carbon emissions couldn't green warrior Ed Davey and his hangers on have taken part by video link?

I also notice the pledge was welcomed by a representative of Oxfam who also happens to be in Doha. If we want to stop our money being squandered like this  we should stop the incestuous links between green lobbyists, so called charities and our political elite.


Parliamentary Information Office and Yearbook

Parliamentary Information Yearbook - Discussion on Debt

Parliamentary Information Yearbook: Another way of looking at it is that Osborne even with the most generous estimate has reduced the deficit by 20b BUT if he had not cut infrastructure spending , the economy would have kept on growing at 3% a year ie over two years the output would be 6% higher now , or £60b a year in a trillion pound economy.

So he has lost us £60b a year over the next ten years ie the debt will be £600b a year over the next ten years , all because he wanted to save a one off 20b.

He should understand simple economics and reverse course now and borrow from the companies and British people and start investing massively in wind and solar farms and super high speed underground trains and overland picturesque motorways eg through the Penines which will encourge tourism and link east and west.





Parliamentary Information Yearbook: so austerity is proved yet again to be a mistaken policy.



Parliamentary Information Office

Performance About Election

Parliamentary Information Yearbook: A VOTE FOR THE MOTIVE TO BE PRODUCTIVE.. INSTEAD OF THE DRUGS TO BE AGREEABLE... THE SPIRIT OF WORTLEY FORGE ...THE OLYMPIC SARCASM OF WORKING CLASS RESURRECTION AGAINST NHS THEOLOGIES..!!!

When that money should have been spent on converting every man's aspirations into productive and constructive work... and every woman's aspirations into passion and romance

The most productive nation on earth and the most productive and inventively competitive people on earth turned into idle syndromically reclusive submissive dur brains for medieval methodologies...

No wonder they were fed up... the olympics opening ceremony said it all.. James Bond Skyfall said it all..

Where was the drive the ambition the gloriousness the heroism the potency the work the motive to produce in us all???? Where was all the procreative aliveness of encouraging entertaining life???

The liberals had turned us into consumers underperformers wasters feeble minded obeissantes for an immigrant regime of establishmentarians to remind everybody they had the freedom to do what they felt like but the rest of humanity had to obey and serve them  involuntarily by the substances polluting their brains!!!

Every labour man naturally despises liberalism for turning  his awesome potential into the expense of being the way they like!!!

Every conservative vocationally despises liberals for wasting the motives of his life and for turning his glorious sporting optimism into poverty and mislead perversities

Every BNP and UKIP man despises liberals for trying to prevent people being british and being a law unto themselves with their own autonomy and knowledge the way every adult should have!!!

British men and women do not need liberalism they need the funds and freedom to procreate and produce the way they naturally and vocationally care about and know how to!!!

GOD wants us to be proud of every day on earth and the good work we do... and you can't do that whilst you are being a liberal!!!

 Parliamentary Information Yearbook: I read news now...

Parliamentary Information Yearbook:

The Tories need to promise a referendum on EU membership at the next election. This lets have the British people have their say and voting for UKIP a wasted vote.

Read other news at Parliamentary Information Office

News for Households

Parliamentary Information Yearbook: "Households may have to pay up to £125 per year to cover the cost of “green” home improvements for the poorest customers under Coalition plans"

Isnt this kind of thing what Ofgem is for? Supposedly meant to protect against supplier's unfair price rises and charges, but once again just seems inept, inactive and pointless.

Nothing has been said or done about the consumer/wholesale price relation. Nothing done about the feed-in-tariff being unfairly passed to consumers. It wont do anything about this either, but presumably it is costing the tax payer 100s of millions to do this.

Does anyone understand the real point of Ofgem? I dont.

Parliamentary Information Yearbook: Once we've insulated the countries poorest homes I don't suppose it will end there, what sort of warped mind thinks its okay to slap a charge on peoples private bills just to spend it on the whim of the day.
In truth it will just go into the pot as another tax.

Parliamentary Information Office and Yearbook.

Parliamentary Information Office As Well As Guide

Parliamentary Information Office: Need for Every Person to know more about Parliament.



Parliamentary Yearbook: Wide Variety of Political News.



Parliamentary Diary: Hub of Parliament News.





Some Parliamentary Information Office Resources.

Important News

parliamentary information office: Please fix it for me to get a job in the BBC where I can be asleep on the job and receive  a large payout when someone wakes me up.






parliamentary information office:

What you mean is they've been suspended or in modern parlance "sent on gardening leave".
Only the BBC would come up with a "form of words" designed to sugar the pill in case it hurts the little dears' feelings.
And while we're having a wee rant about it, what does the Head of News do that the Head of Newsgathering doesn't do?
Or how come there are enough spare bodies kicking around the place that they can just take over someone else's job pro tem at the drop of a hat? That's three so far.
Palmesan is right — it's long past re-entry time for Spaceship Beeb. Question is whether the heatshield can stand it.






parliamentary information office:

The Today Programme this morning demonstrated all that was wrong with the BBC: lengthy interviews with an unrepresentive number of licence payers, followed by David Dimbleby with his mantra of 'great, talented, underpaid' (apparently the problems are all down to semantics); no mention of the child abuse cover-ups; stepping aside of staff (no doubt to allow them time to negotiate their severance pay); no mention of tax avoidance scams.When will they accept that living off tithes coerced from the public under threat of criminal prosecution is immoral.






parliamentary information office:

At least we're getting to see plenty of the £1 billion refurbisment of Television Centre as the revolving door whirls ever faster with staff "stepping aside" and then nipping back into to arrange their obscene pay-offs or new job-titles.




parliamentary information office

Independence Information

parliamentary information office: the SG has always had the power to move tax on earnings by 3 p in the pound up or down. Now it will be 10p due to the Scotland act. So have they ever reduced PAYE tax. They could do it tomorrow if they wanted help low income families and others. 75 percent of all Uk law comes from Brussels. In the eurozone it is raidly increasing. That would be because it's a political union. What do you think that huge parliament in Brussels is there for?--- give me all your money and I will give you some pocket money back? The Uk borrows 10 billion per year to keep Scotland at the standard it has. It's not pocket money. It's everything plus 10 billion. Which part of the word deficit do you not understand? If you want independence then there are few south of the border who actually care. But don't pretend and play the victim.



parliamentary information office: The SNP have made up their policies on the hoof. From a scrap book out of a Christmas wish list. No consultations have been made with the third parties required to deliver the goodies.

First it was EU membership and next it will invariably be no thank you to sharing the £. The third rider of the apocalypse will when the USA announces shortly before the referendum no nukes no NATO.

Best plans laid bare. Thats the trouble with thinking aloud before actually thinking things through and getting agreements in place first.





parliamentary information office: Cooking the books is hardly a surprise. What is more surprising that some people do actually believe that a £10bn deficit can actually deliver an additional £500 a head to spend. Bendy calculators are the order of the day.




parliamentary information office: I doubt that anybody will be able to produce definitive figures for the cost/benefit of Independence to Scotland. It will probably come down to feelings of national pride. If the Scots wish to be independent, then they must be, whatever the consequences. After all, the British appear to want to be free from the smothering embrace of the EU. There would eventually be agreement on the allocation of assets and debts and what to do about defence. At the very least there will be no need for the sort of bickering that seems to be so prevalent on these comment pages, as well as in politics.


Get more detailed political information at parliamentary information office.

Agenda for Reform

parliamentary information office: I don't know if Andrea Leadsom is, like a frightened child whistling in the dark, totally ignorant of how under EU laws, the powers surrendered by past and present administrations cannot be repatriated, or being deliberately disingenuous. In either event her call for 'fundamental reform', is empty of any any real hope of change.

Given the manner in which EU law works, the only hope we have for fundamental change is with the unanimous agreement of all the other other member states, I believe the chances of that occurring is about as likely as the Tories keeping the seat at the forthcoming election in Corby.

The only other way we can bring about the sort of change Ms  Leadsom is advocating is for parliament to pass a bill refuting the 1973 EU treaty, since the chances of that coming to pass, is about as likely as Mr. Cameron agreeing to an IN/OUT referendum after the Christmas recess.

As a life long Tory Voter, I am disgusted and disappointed by the rhetoric and misleading comments in respect if the EU, emanating from Downing street I'm equally dismayed when I read meaningless articles such as Ms Leadsom as chosen to write. It is because of that I have defected to Ukip.





parliamentary information office: the EU needs fundamental reform. This is where Conservatives – and the country – should target their energies.

How do you propose that this will happen, Andrea?

Britain is but one ofthe 27 members of the eu club and not even a highly regarded one. The vague concept of "reform" may appeal to some of the other fringe members (Sweden, Poland and possibly Denmark) but there is no clarity as to what form it should take. Worse, it is likely to be vigourously resisted by the club's heavy-weights* and the eu apparat itself.

I have more chance of seeing a squadron of pigs fly past my window oinking in harmony the theme tune from Dambusters.

*Especially the French, for whom the CAP is merely a way to get foreigners to pay French peasants to stay away from Paris and the Spanish, for whom the CFP serves a similar purpose vis a vis Spanish fishermen and Madrid.




parliamentary information office: This is more of the silly, naive "we're winning the argument; they're moving in our direction"-type thinking that has characterized British self deception over Europe for the past couple of decades. Our continental partners have their own agenda toward which British ideas of reform have little relevance. EU "reform" is on a trajectory towards banking, fiscal and political integration.



parliamentary information office: I think my local quilt making club should undergo fundamental change to a cage bird club. That way I can remain a member and not bitch about hating making quilts. Tell you what might be a better idea. Why don't I leave the quilt-making club and join the cage bird club, which is my hobby? That will also help the people who enjoy making quilts to do so without a pain in the ass hanging around. I never realised I am a genius.


Parliamentary Information Office offers featured political news.

Information on Beauty Spot

parliamentary information office: Sidmouth is one of the few elegant seaside towns left in the country. My grandmother and aunt came from Beer and both lived in Shaldon. We visited the village for my aunt's 90th birthday and were utterly shocked by what this council had done.

A rash of housing dominates every hillside which were once fields and woods and we were stuck in a a traffic jam! The beaches where as children, we could play freely with our dogs, or launch my aunt's sailing dinghy are either cut off by caravan parks or signs forbidding this and that.

Stand your ground and Save Sidmouth!






parliamentary information office: Overcrowded Britain is the spivs dream come true.

Stop the illegal occupation of Britain and the misuse of services and resources - we only have a housing problem because of the MILLIONS of people who should not be in Britain.

Stop this madness by not voting for the 3 parties that have created this crisis over the last 60 years.  They will not do anything any different and we need to get out the EU now not in a few years time when the damage will be greater and more costly to fix.

If any of the Lib/Lab/Cons get in at the next general election it'll be impossible to save any part of the countryside because the EU will do what it always does and make new laws that we will be told to obey and there will be NOTHING your local MP or parliament can do about it.  Please think carefully before you vote because each and every vote has far reaching implications for you, your family, your community and our country and British way of life.

The EU is hell bent on eliminating the 'British way of life' and British values make no mistake that is their goal.  We're to be serfs in the northern zone outpost of the EU to be used as a cash cow.

If you want your country back vote UKIP they are the only party that has the withdrawal of Britain from the EU Ponzi scheme as its top priority.






parliamentary information office: It is Sidmouth and Sidbury and Sidford!

Along the Sid Valley the council appear to be trying to destroy the things which give the area its character. They don't seem to have realised  that the area thrives because of tourism.

They want to knock down a Drill Hall, erected in 1895, on the Esplanade at Sidmouth and replace it with extra 'parking' for local boats which seem to manage quite well at the moment: and then eventually build houses on it.

They want to sell off, demolish and develop what is now the EDDC council houses but was originally a large house built in about 1810 at The Knowle in Sidmouth.

They want to build an industrial park in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty between Sidford and Sidbury which are both small villages; despite the fact that many local industrial units are standing empty.

Budleigh Salterton, Exmouth, Feniton (to mention just a few) also have problems with the council trying to destroy the historic elements of their areas.

The coalition National Planning Policy Framework places great emphasis on heritage assets, history tourism and people's sense of place which leads to good communities and yet the EDDC won't listed to the voice of the community.

When you have a population of less than 14,000 in a town and a petition signed by almost 4,000 people against the council plans then it seems to me that there is more than a 'vocal minority' against it whatever the leader of the council may pretend to believe.

Sidmouth also hosts an amazing Folk Festival during the first week in August and the feel of the town with many, many fine Regency and Victorian buildings adds to the wonderful atmosphere, as does the beach.

EDDC should cherish the variety and history of the area over which it holds power.


parliamentary information office: To all you beardy people with homes....just think.  The UK population is already 63 million (soon to be 70 million)  and rising.  Where do they all live....in tent city?
   

Look towards parliamentary information office gives more awareness on Politics.

Child Benefit Information

parliamentary information office: Because of the farcical way this policy is being implemented I think people will be more determined than normal to avoid these changes if they can.

Those that can afford to will pay extra into a pension - particularly those at a £50k-£60k level.  The self employed will manipulate earnings to their best advantage.  The unmarried may well claim to not be in a relationship.  People will claim to live at different addresses. 

Of course, if people pay more into a pension, they have less to spend now.  They will cut back accordingly.  Hardly helping the economy is it?

Someone on £50k with 3 kids faces an effective tax rate of 67% on any pay increase.  That's ridiculous.  Nobody should be taxed at 67%

For the government it's all about trying to make a political point.  If they can get the majority to believe this is a good thing and that the 'rich' are being made to pay then they will think they've done well.

I suspect the cost of administering this will end up outweighing any savings.




parliamentary information office: Just like the US corporations that we are all so angry at, people will find ways to play the system, guided by the accountancy and tax consultancy profession.  There are too many loopholes and stupid inconsistencies, such as two 50K earners retaining their child benefit but the family that relies on a single 100K earner loses out.

We need to simplify our tax system and stop the shell game of wealth redistribution through outdated allowances and benefits.  Make the safety net exactly that and ensure that benefits are subsistance only.


parliamentary information office: Why don't  the puppets of the Elite stop thieving from the taxpayer, stop aid to other countries, cease paying Child Benefit to children that arent born/live here, Get us OUT of the EU.. ( the list is endless).....hows about.....you corrupt bunch sacrifice your salaries, stop sponging off the tax payer and live like us poor plebs who are in it together...!


parliamentary information office: would make more sense to make cuts in Govt spending and spend 50% of the saving on income tax cuts.  Get rid of child benefit and expensive to administer tax credits altogether in the process to ensure that having children is no longer a way of making money for some, perpetuating and expanding the culture of the welfare trap.

Parliament News 2012 - parliamentary information office

Child Benefits

parliamentary information office: many reasons these cuts are wrong, first of which is because they're not based on joint income. Secondly, self-employed have far more wriggle room and can avoid it more easily. Further, there is no recognition that £50k is not the same everywhere. In a country where so much of the market is London (a shame, I think) a high proportion of the jobs are here and £50k doesn't go as far as it does in other places.

For those who say the tax payer should not be 'funding the wealthy', please consider that taxpayers pay for the wealthy's medical care, education in state schools, roads, etc. Don't take such a narrow view on one item and remember that if you want to restrict child benefit to the less well off, that does not remove any incentive for them to have more children, it only removes the incentive for those families who have one earner over £50k.

For a much better way to reduce government spending, have a look at the number of politicians representing a relatively small population. We need fewer politicians which would result in fewer special projects.


parliamentary information office: I entirely agree with Mr. Gauke on cutting these kinds of benefits for middle class families and upwards.  If anything, I think the limit of £60,000 (is that individual or family income?) is not low enough.

However on personal allowance cuts for pensioners, I think there are very good reasons for maintaining the age-related scaling.  Here are a few for you Mr. Gauke:

1. Pensioners by their nature are no longer accumulating wealth (for the most part) and changes in the tax system has a proportionately greater effect on their income, particularly as this is likely to be significantly lower than when they were earning.  This might be offset to some extent by lower expenditure as age increases but that, in my opinion, is about personal choice.

2. Pensioners who have a pension income that will be impacted by the changes are going to be those who have spent their life contributing to the system , do not depend on benefits and have accumulated their pension rights through savings and/ or company benefits.  If anyone deserves a break to enjoy a little bit more of the fruit of their labors it is pensioners.  It's all very well to talk of sharing the pain but in the latter part of your life it is quite literally a life sentence because there is no guarantee you will be around for the long term gain after the short term pain.

3.  Changes of this nature to the tax code always hit the lower middle income earners the hardest; those at the margin of the threshold.  Again at this time of life, when you might already be struggling to get by.


parliamentary information office: There is another injustice in the system that I think has not been aired sufficiently. Both my wife and I work full time, pay for childcare, have a couple of hours with the kids in the evening and spend the week juggling priorities between work and home. It was my choice to have kids and because our joint income is 'comfortable' I agree with child benefit being taken away from me as part of being 'all in this together'. What I do object to however are couples who make the decision for one partner (usually the female partner) to stay at home with the kids and then qualify for further tax credits or other benefits. If one parent chooses not to work then they should stand on their own two feet financially. I am not happy to subsidise their lifestyle juggling my work and family so that they can enjoy the benefits of spending more time with their kids.


parliamentary information office

Beer Tax Information

 

parliamentary information office

So, - very soon a pub serving beer will be as difficult to find as a service station selling petrol.   Oh well, lets all stay at home and break open a can of coke and a packet of crisps.

NO, NO, NO, - lets all go to a pub for smokers only, staffed by smokers only and operated by a pipe smoking independent landlord who can choose his own beers AND sell tobacco.

Non smokers still welcome of course (bring your own mask) and chairs will be provided in the pub car park - if they prefer fresh air.   Truth is, most of them would use the smoking pubs and ignore the risk to 'elf and safety - just as they did before they were allowed to mount their high horses.

Pubs have always been a British traditional way of friendly social gathering, but alas, - it is now fast becoming yet another loss to the British way of life - and to lose it to a pressure group unable or unwilling to support the fabric they have effectively destroyed, is foolish, unfair and unforgivable.

Selfish, whinging, self righteous and holier-than-thou so called fresh air addicts, will no doubt overlook their contributions to polluted air and people annoying pastimes - and will already be frothing with indignation and setting up a torrent of suitable words to demolish my "dreadfully mistaken" line of reasoning.

Fire away, - you have every right to disagree, but I have given my viewpoint and have no intention of being drawn into a response, or conduct a pointless exchange of tit-for-tat point scoring with any of you.   I rest my case.



parliamentary information office

Of course none of these problems are in any way related to the simple fact that the breweries continue to control the means of production, the means of distribution and the retail outlets (i.e. the pubs); and that for years they have used that power to fix the price of a basic pint. IIRC were'nt some breweries caught setting up cartels back in the 80's so that they could fix the regional price of a pint?

If you want pubs to flourish and thrive then they need to be set free. The breweries should be forced to sell off all the pubs to individual landlords and those pubs should then be allowed to buy their wares on a truly open market at free and competitive prices.


parliamentary information office

Another English tradition going down the plug hole, drinking at home is not quite the same as going down to the local.

parliamentary information office

The blindingly obvious point that many will choose to avoid is that the pubs have all seen a move of the usual clients who now go to the superstore for cut price beer and wines and spirits for 1 single reason the decline coincides with the SMOKING BAN.

Other News Resource

Multiple Choice for Election

parliamentary information office: "Listless in the first (debate) and barely there in the third." Really? Everyone agrees that Obama had a poor first debate, even his supporters, but Obama crushed Romney in the second AND THIRD debate. To think otherwise is deliberately obtuse and biased. Every single poll taken afterwards declared Obama to be the clear winner, and by the way, latest polls are giving Obama a bigger lead.

parliamentary information office: I think he could be elected here but his affiliations with the religious right and anti women's rights would probably torpedo him with the middle class and even moderate conservatives

parliamentary information office: The Lotto Max is Canada's version of the American dream. Why? Because investors and banks despise funding small startup companies here, even well established ones. Canada is a resource exporter even though we have some truly genius level people. Keep electing the Libs and Cons folks, and NOTHING WILL CHANGE...your status quo will be secure, but your future won't be.

parliamentary information office: Did you happen to notice that although we just had a record Lotto Max Jackpot...NOBODY WON THE BIG ONE. Congrats Canada, and especially our own beloved OLG who promote gambling as a means to wealth and success, and we are all guilty of 'hoping' we're the 'Lucky One.' I rarely even buy a ticket..did buy 3 hits on this one...as usual, not even a Free Ticket. Bye Bye OLG and your pseudo Tax Plan.

parliamentary information office: He would be electable only if Canada were as anti-social a country as the US. YOU MEAN ANTI-SOIALISTS AS IN ANTI NDP? americans are by no means anti-social, they are actually friendlier than canadians and more open

parliamentary information office: Just like our Harper and Conservaives in Canada, there is very little difference between conservatives and liberals. Both are in the middle, both support middle class and business class,excepting taxation policy.Lierals are dead in Canada,Romnesia equals Harperism.

parliamentary information office: Republicans are three things ---- in the US or a combo of three: religious, racist, or rich. ---- EXTREME BIGOTED GENERALIZATION - is there something wrong with being "religious"? Obama did belong to Jeremiah Wright's church - rich like the Democrat kennedy's and Hollywood stars - university professors are sort of rich by most people's standards -- racist? how?

parliamentary information office: Actually, a large number of minorities have turned Rethuglican because they have more patriotism to Jesus, than to their country. Why? Congress refuses to compromise, but Jesus is coming to save them all. They may hate Obamacare, but they LOVE Jesuscare...it's their no premium Fire Insurance policy. Just walk down the aisle, pledge your soul, and VOILA, all will be well, including wealth.

parliamentary information office: They focus on the Presidency as though he is a King with unlimited powers. The President is not all powerful. congress writes the laws, determines the funding, and with it the Pork barrel allocations. Congress buries so much BS in otherwise good Bills that it is just a game. That puts the President in the position of choosing the lesser evils, by signing or vetoing what he Congress passes.


This Parliamentary Information Yearbook blog post on multiple choice for election.

Analysis By Professionals

Professional provides information on the subject of parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional shares thoughts on parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional shares information regarding parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional shares useful information on the subject of parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional shares views on the subject of parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional contributes to information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional gives advanced technological information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional shares views on parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional provides advanced information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Professional shares technological information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.

Experts View

Expert shares views on the subject of parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert contributes to information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert gives advanced technological information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert shares views on parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert provides advanced information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert shares technological information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert gives views on the topics of parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert provides advanced information about parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert gives technical know-how on parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert shares technical views on topics such as parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.


Expert gives technical knowledge on current topics such as parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office, parliamentary information office.

Ways to Get Updated Parliament Information

• Subscribe the Parliament News RSS
  
• Email Alerts
  
• Media Feed
  
• Blog Feed
  
• Article Feed
  
• Press Releases RSS

This Parliamentary Information Yearbook blog post shows way to get latest Parliament Information.

Author's View on Parliamentary Information Yearbook

Parliamentary Information Yearbook

Emma George shares benefits Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Resource

Richard Levi shared Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office that make you more close to Parliament.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Info

Alberta Caddick shares professional Profile of Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook on Web

Polly Taylor shares Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office which shows latest discussion on various topics.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Blog

Harry Cooper show topics on Parliament information on Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office blogs.


 

                                                  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Details

John Franklin shares featured information on Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Online

Doris Wright has shared Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office to help the people by spreading Parliament news.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Questions Answers

Esther Steve shows happening questions and related answers on Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office.

  Parliamentary Information Yearbook Spread News

Hannah Mary shares Parliamentary Information Yearbook - parliamentary information office, online source to get more news.

This Parliamentary Information Yearbook blog post on Authors shared words.

Answer for How to Get Parliament Information

Below helpful keywords help you to find Parliament information of London, UK.

Parliamentary Information Office UK

Parliamentary Information Office England

Parliamentary Information Office United Kingdom

Parliamentary Information Office in UK

Parliamentary Information Office in England

Parliamentary Information Office in United Kingdom

Parliamentary Information Office 2006

Parliamentary Information Office 2007

Parliamentary Information Office 2008

Parliamentary Information Office 2009

Parliamentary Information Office 2010

Parliamentary Information Office 2011

Parliamentary Information Office 2012

Parliamentary Information Office of 2006

Parliamentary Information Office of 2007

Parliamentary Information Office of 2008

Parliamentary Information Office of 2009

Parliamentary Information Office of 2010

Parliamentary Information Office of 2011

Parliamentary Information Office of 2012

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2006

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2007

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2008

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2009

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2010

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2011

Parliamentary Information Office UK 2012

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2006

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2007

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2008

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2009

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2010

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2011

Parliamentary Information Office of UK 2012

Parliamentary Information 2006

Parliamentary Information 2007

Parliamentary Information 2008

Parliamentary Information 2009

Parliamentary Information 2010

Parliamentary Information 2011

Parliamentary Information 2012

Parliamentary Information of 2006

Parliamentary Information of 2007

Parliamentary Information of 2008

Parliamentary Information of 2009

Parliamentary Information of 2010

Parliamentary Information of 2011

Parliamentary Information of 2012

Parliamentary Information UK 2006

Parliamentary Information UK 2007

Parliamentary Information UK 2008

Parliamentary Information UK 2009

Parliamentary Information UK 2010

Parliamentary Information UK 2011

Parliamentary Information UK 2012

Parliamentary Information of UK 2006

Parliamentary Information of UK 2007

Parliamentary Information of UK 2008

Parliamentary Information of UK 2009

Parliamentary Information of UK 2010

Parliamentary Information of UK 2011

Parliamentary Information of UK 2012

Parliamentary 2006

Parliamentary 2007

Parliamentary 2008

Parliamentary 2009

Parliamentary 2010

Parliamentary 2011

Parliamentary 2012

Parliamentary of 2006

Parliamentary of 2007

Parliamentary of 2008

Parliamentary of 2009

Parliamentary of 2010

Parliamentary of 2011

Parliamentary of 2012

Parliamentary UK 2006

Parliamentary UK 2007

Parliamentary UK 2008

Parliamentary UK 2009

Parliamentary UK 2010

Parliamentary UK 2011

Parliamentary UK 2012

Parliamentary of UK 2006

Parliamentary of UK 2007

Parliamentary of UK 2008

Parliamentary of UK 2009

Parliamentary of UK 2010

Parliamentary of UK 2011

Parliamentary of UK 2012

Parliament Information Office 2006

Parliament Information Office 2007

Parliament Information Office 2008

Parliament Information Office 2009

Parliament Information Office 2010

Parliament Information Office 2011

Parliament Information Office 2012

Parliament Information Office of 2006

Parliament Information Office of 2007

Parliament Information Office of 2008

Parliament Information Office of 2009

Parliament Information Office of 2010

Parliament Information Office of 2011

Parliament Information Office of 2012

Parliament Information Office UK 2006

Parliament Information Office UK 2007

Parliament Information Office UK 2008

Parliament Information Office UK 2009

Parliament Information Office UK 2010

Parliament Information Office UK 2011

Parliament Information Office UK 2012

Parliament Information Office of UK 2006

Parliament Information Office of UK 2007

Parliament Information Office of UK 2008

Parliament Information Office of UK 2009

Parliament Information Office of UK 2010

Parliament Information Office of UK 2011

Parliament Information Office of UK 2012

Parliament Information 2006

Parliament Information 2007

Parliament Information 2008

Parliament Information 2009

Parliament Information 2010

Parliament Information 2011

Parliament Information 2012

Parliament Information of 2006

Parliament Information of 2007

Parliament Information of 2008

Parliament Information of 2009

Parliament Information of 2010

Parliament Information of 2011

Parliament Information of 2012

Parliament Information UK 2006

Parliament Information UK 2007

Parliament Information UK 2008

Parliament Information UK 2009

Parliament Information UK 2010

Parliament Information UK 2011

Parliament Information UK 2012

Parliament Information of UK 2006

Parliament Information of UK 2007

Parliament Information of UK 2008

Parliament Information of UK 2009

Parliament Information of UK 2010

Parliament Information of UK 2011

Parliament Information of UK 2012

Parliament 2006

Parliament 2007

Parliament 2008

Parliament 2009

Parliament 2010

Parliament 2011

Parliament 2012

Parliament of 2006

Parliament of 2007

Parliament of 2008

Parliament of 2009

Parliament of 2010

Parliament of 2011

Parliament of 2012

Parliament UK 2006

Parliament UK 2007

Parliament UK 2008

Parliament UK 2009

Parliament UK 2010

Parliament UK 2011

Parliament UK 2012

Parliament of UK 2006

Parliament of UK 2007

Parliament of UK 2008

Parliament of UK 2009

Parliament of UK 2010

Parliament of UK 2011

Parliament of UK 2012


This Parliamentary Yearbook Information Office blog post is about to get updated Parliament News.